Section 21-L of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, provides specific legal provisions regarding the punishment of an absconder. An absconder is defined as a person who evades legal process, such as a warrant of arrest, by hiding or fleeing the jurisdiction of the court. This section is designed to ensure that individuals cannot escape the consequences of terrorism-related charges by avoiding judicial proceedings.

Section 11-EEEEE of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, specifically addresses the restrictions and prohibitions regarding the disposal of property involved in cases under the Act. This provision ensures that evidence or assets linked to terrorism-related offenses are preserved for legal proceedings and are not disposed of prematurely by unauthorized parties.

Section 21-I of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, addresses the liability of abettors. It ensures that those who assist, facilitate, or encourage the commission of terrorist acts are held equally accountable under the law, facing the same potential sentencing as those who directly commit the act.

Section 21-E of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, provides the legal basis and procedural requirements for the remand of an accused person into police or judicial custody. This section is critical for the investigative process, as it defines the duration and conditions under which an accused may be held pending trial, ensuring that the investigative agency has sufficient time to collect evidence while protecting the rights of the accused.

Section 21-F of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, explicitly restricts the power of the government or any authority to grant remission, pardon, or commutation of sentences for individuals convicted under the specific provisions of this Act. This is a mandatory provision intended to ensure that those convicted of terrorism-related offenses serve their full sentences without the benefit of standard executive clemency or remission policies.

Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, outlines the punishments for various terrorist acts. Subsection (i) serves as a residuary provision, covering offences that fall under the scope of the Act but are not explicitly assigned a specific penalty in the preceding subsections (a) through (h). This ensures that all terrorist-related conduct is subject to legal sanction under the Act.

The designation of a cordoned area can be executed through both oral and written directives. While written orders provide formal documentation for legal records, oral instructions are often necessary for immediate operational implementation during emergency situations. Both methods are recognized to ensure that law enforcement can effectively secure areas during investigations.

Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, is the primary provision that outlines the specific punishments for individuals convicted of committing acts of terrorism as defined under Section 6 of the same Act. It serves as the legal basis for sentencing in terrorism-related cases within the jurisdiction of Pakistan.

Under the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the court is empowered to maintain order and decorum during proceedings. If a person is found guilty of contempt, the court may impose a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for a period not exceeding six months, serving as a deterrent against obstruction of justice.

Section 22 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, grants the Provincial Government the authority to specify the manner and place for the execution of a sentence passed by an Anti-Terrorism Court, ensuring that the execution process aligns with statutory requirements and public order considerations.