May 2024 Edition
Start May Quiz
May 2024 Current Affairs MCQs & Solutions
Top national & international current affairs questions for CSS, PMS, FPSC, PPSC, and NTS screening tests.
#2041
Under Section 4(m) of the Cr.P.C., what is the term for a proceeding where evidence is or may be legally taken on oath?
(a) Judicial proceeding
(b) Trial
(c) Inquiry
(d) None of above
Explanation: Section 4(m) of the Code of Criminal Procedure defines a 'judicial proceeding' as any proceeding in the course of which evidence is or may be legally taken on oath. This definition is crucial for distinguishing between administrative actions and formal legal processes that carry the weight of judicial authority and evidentiary standards.
#2042
To which judicial authority may a person appeal an order made by a Magistrate under Section 118 requiring security for keeping the peace or for good behavior?
(a) Special Judge
(b) Court of Magistrate Under Section 30
(c) None of above
(d) Session Judge
Explanation: Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, an order passed by a Magistrate under Section 118 requiring security for keeping the peace or for good behavior is appealable to the Court of Session. The Sessions Judge has the appellate jurisdiction to review such orders to ensure they were passed in accordance with the law and evidence.
#2043
Under Section 7(2), what actions may a court take when an offender, for whom a warrant was issued, appears before it for non-compliance?
(a) None of above
(b) Admit him on bail with or without sureties
(c) Both A and B
(d) Remand him to judicial custody until the case is heard
Explanation: Section 7(2) of the Probation of Offenders Ordinance, 1960, grants the court the authority to manage the custody of an offender who has failed to appear. The court may either remand the offender to judicial custody to ensure their presence or release them on bail, depending on the circumstances of the case and the court's assessment of the risk of flight.
#2044
If a woman sentenced to death is found to be pregnant, what order may the High Court pass regarding the execution of the sentence?
(a) Release
(b) Acquittal
(c) None of above
(d) Imprisonment for life
Explanation: Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, if a woman sentenced to death is found to be pregnant, the court is mandated to postpone the execution. The court has the discretionary power to commute the death sentence to imprisonment for life, considering the humanitarian aspect of the unborn child's life.
#2045
Under Section 340(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in what capacity may an accused person provide evidence?
(a) On oath
(b) None of above
(c) On oath as well as without oath
(d) Without oath
Explanation: Section 340(2) of the CrPC provides that any person against whom proceedings are instituted in any criminal court may offer themselves as a witness in their own defense. When an accused chooses to testify as a witness under this provision, they must do so on oath. This allows the accused to provide testimony that is subject to cross-examination, thereby placing their version of events on the record with the same evidentiary weight as other witnesses.
#2046
Which section of the Code of Criminal Procedure specifies the circumstances under which multiple persons may be charged and tried together?
(a) None of above
(b) 239
(c) 241
(d) 240
Explanation: Section 239 of the CrPC outlines the conditions under which several persons may be charged and tried together. This includes situations where persons are accused of the same offense committed in the course of the same transaction, or where one person is accused of committing an offense and another of abetment or attempt to commit the same offense. This provision promotes judicial efficiency by consolidating related cases into a single trial.
#2047
Which section of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) specifies the conditions under which multiple persons may be charged and tried together?
(a) 241
(b) None of above
(c) 239
(d) 240
Explanation: Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) outlines the circumstances under which persons accused of the same offense or different offenses committed in the course of the same transaction may be charged and tried together. This provision aims to ensure judicial efficiency and consistency in the trial process.
#2048
Under which section of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) may an appeal be filed against an order of acquittal?
(a) 407, Cr.P.C
(b) 417, Cr.P.C
(c) None of above
(d) 427, Cr.P.C
Explanation: Section 417 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) provides the legal framework for the Provincial Government to direct the Public Prosecutor to present an appeal to the High Court against an original or appellate order of acquittal passed by any court other than a High Court. This serves as a vital mechanism for the state to challenge acquittals that are deemed legally or factually erroneous.
#2049
Under Section 143 of the CrPC, what legal definition governs the public nuisance that a Magistrate of the 1st Class may order to be ceased?
(a) None of above
(b) Constitution of Pakistan
(c) Cr.P.C.
(d) Pakistan Penal Code or any special or local law
Explanation: Section 143 of the Code of Criminal Procedure empowers a Magistrate to issue orders against public nuisances as defined under the Pakistan Penal Code or other applicable special or local laws, ensuring the protection of public health and safety.
#2050
Under which section of the Cr.P.C. may a Magistrate allow a person to appear through a pleader instead of requiring their personal attendance?
(a) 115
(b) 116
(c) 117
(d) None of above
Explanation: Section 116 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) grants the Magistrate the discretion to dispense with the personal attendance of an individual during proceedings. If the Magistrate finds sufficient cause, they may permit the person to be represented by a pleader, thereby facilitating the legal process while accommodating the individual's circumstances.
#2051
Which class of Magistrate powers may be exercised by an authorized officer, such as an Armed Forces member or election official, regarding offences like personation or capturing a polling station?
(a) Sessions Judge
(b) Magistrate
(c) High Court Judge
(d) None of the above
Explanation: Section 193 clause (a) of the relevant election laws states that such a person under these circumstances shall exercise the powers of a Magistrate of the first class under the Code in respect of the offences of personation, or capturing of polling station or polling booth. This provision ensures that designated officials have the necessary legal authority to maintain order during the electoral process.
#2052
Under what authority may a police officer arrest a person without a warrant for committing personation or an offence under the Elections Act?
(a) District Returning Officer
(b) Assistant Presiding Officer
(c) Presiding Officer
(d) Returning Officer
Explanation: Section 194 of the Elections Act, 2017, empowers a police officer to arrest any person without a warrant if that person commits personation or an offence under Section 183, provided the Presiding Officer directs such an arrest. This provision grants the Presiding Officer immediate authority to maintain order and integrity at the polling station, allowing for swift action against individuals who attempt to undermine the electoral process through illegal activities like impersonation.
#2053
Under the Elections Act, 2017, if the turnout of women voters in a constituency is less than what percentage, the Election Commission may presume that women were restrained from voting and declare the election void?
(a) Ten
(b) Twenty
(c) Five
(d) Fifteen
Explanation: According to the explanation provided under Section 9 of the Elections Act, 2017, if the turnout of women voters is less than ten percent of the total votes polled in a constituency, the Commission may presume that women voters have been restrained through an agreement from casting their votes. Consequently, the Commission has the authority to declare the polling at one or more polling stations or the election in the whole constituency void.
#2054
What is the maximum legal limit for election expenses that a candidate contesting for a seat in the National Assembly may incur?
(a) Three million
(b) Four million
(c) One million
(d) Two million
Explanation: Under the provisions of the Elections Act, specifically Section 132, subsection 3, clause (b), the legislature has established a financial ceiling for campaign spending. For candidates seeking election to the National Assembly, the law stipulates that total election expenses must not exceed four million rupees. This regulation is intended to promote a level playing field and prevent excessive financial influence in the electoral process.
#2055
What forms of evidence may a plaintiff utilize to substantiate their claim in a civil suit?
(a) None of these
(b) Primary evidence
(c) Secondary evidence
(d) Oral, Primary or Secondary evidence
Explanation: In civil litigation, the burden of proof rests on the plaintiff to establish their case. The Qanun-e-Shahadat Order allows for various modes of proof, including primary evidence (the original document), secondary evidence (copies or oral accounts of documents under specific conditions), and oral evidence (testimony of witnesses). The court evaluates the totality of these evidence types to determine if the plaintiff has successfully discharged their burden of proof.
#2056
Under Article 45 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, admissions do not constitute conclusive proof of the facts admitted, but what legal effect may they have?
(a) None of these
(b) Guideline
(c) Final conclusions
(d) Estoppel
Explanation: Under the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, an admission is not conclusive proof of the matters admitted, but it may operate as an estoppel under the provisions of the law. Estoppel prevents a party from denying the truth of a statement they previously made, provided the other party acted upon that statement to their detriment.
#2057
What procedural step may a party take if new facts are introduced during the cross-examination of their witness?
(a) Re-examination of such witness
(b) None of these
(c) All of above
(d) Re-cross examine that witness
Explanation: If new facts or issues are introduced during cross-examination, the party who originally called the witness is permitted to conduct a re-examination. This process is essential for clarifying ambiguities, explaining new information, or addressing potential misconceptions that may have arisen during the cross-examination phase, thereby ensuring a complete and accurate record of the testimony.
#2058
Under what condition may a Magistrate be compelled to testify regarding the propriety of a deposition taken by them during a trial before the Court of Session?
(a) Special Order of Superior Court
(b) His own wish
(c) None of these
(d) Order of Advocate General
Explanation: A Magistrate or Judge cannot be compelled to answer questions regarding their own conduct in court or the manner in which they performed their judicial duties, except upon a special order of a superior court to which they are subordinate. This rule protects judicial independence and ensures that the integrity of the judicial process is not undermined by constant questioning of judicial officers.
#2059
In a civil suit, what types of evidence may a plaintiff utilize to establish their case?
(a) Secondary evidence
(b) None of these
(c) Oral, Primary or Secondary evidence
(d) Primary evidence
Explanation: Under the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, a party is permitted to prove facts in issue or relevant facts through various forms of evidence. This includes oral evidence, primary documentary evidence, or secondary evidence when the conditions for its admissibility are met. The law provides a comprehensive framework allowing the court to consider all legally admissible evidence to determine the truth of the claims presented by the plaintiff.
#2060
Under Article 18 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, evidence may be presented regarding facts in issue and which other category?
(a) None of above
(b) None of these
(c) Relevant facts
(d) Law
Explanation: Article 18 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, establishes the scope of admissibility in legal proceedings. It stipulates that evidence may be given in any suit or proceeding of the existence or non-existence of every fact in issue and of such other facts as are declared to be relevant under the provisions of the Order.