May 2024 Edition
Start May Quiz
May 2024 Current Affairs MCQs & Solutions
Top national & international current affairs questions for CSS, PMS, FPSC, PPSC, and NTS screening tests.
#1921
In May 2010, Israeli commandos intercepted an aid flotilla bound for the Gaza Strip, resulting in casualties. Which country's flag was the primary vessel of this flotilla flying?
(a) Iraq
(b) Netherlands
(c) Turkey
(d) Austria
Explanation: The 2010 Gaza flotilla raid involved several ships, the largest of which was the MV Mavi Marmara, which was registered in Turkey. The incident occurred when Israeli naval forces boarded the ships to enforce a naval blockade of the Gaza Strip. The resulting deaths of nine Turkish activists caused a severe diplomatic crisis between Israel and Turkey, leading to a long-term suspension of normal diplomatic relations and intense international scrutiny regarding the blockade of Gaza.
#1922
The Ankara Declaration of 2024 represents a significant diplomatic development involving which two nations?
(a) None of these
(b) Iran and Saudi Arabia
(c) Ethiopia and Somalia
(d) Armenia and Azerbaijan
Explanation: The Ankara Declaration of 2024 refers to diplomatic efforts mediated by Turkey to address tensions between Ethiopia and Somalia, particularly concerning maritime access and sovereignty disputes. This development highlights Turkey's growing role as a regional mediator in the Horn of Africa, aiming to stabilize relations between the two nations through structured dialogue and diplomatic engagement.
#1923
Who served as the President of the French Republic following his election on May 7, 1995?
(a) Jacques Chirac
(b) None of these
(c) Nicolas Sarkozy
(d) Jean-Pierre Raffarin
Explanation: Jacques Chirac was elected President of France in May 1995, succeeding François Mitterrand. He served two terms, leaving office in 2007. His presidency was notable for his opposition to the 2003 Iraq War and his efforts to strengthen the European Union. The other individuals listed, such as Nicolas Sarkozy, served as presidents at different times, while Jean-Pierre Raffarin served as Prime Minister under Chirac.
#1924
Which individual held the office of President of Bangladesh from April 21, 1977, until May 30, 1981?
(a) Ziaur Rahman
(b) Abdus Sattar
(c) Shah Azizur Rahman
(d) Abu Sayeed Chowdhury
Explanation: Ziaur Rahman, a military officer and politician, served as the President of Bangladesh during this period. He founded the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and initiated several economic and social reforms aimed at stabilizing the nation after the political turmoil of the early 1970s. His presidency ended abruptly with his assassination in 1981, an event that had significant repercussions for the political stability of Bangladesh.
#1925
Who held the office of French Prime Minister at the time of the German offensive on 10 May 1940?
(a) Paul Reynaud
(b) Pierre Laval
(c) Leon Blum
(d) Edourd Daladier
Explanation: Paul Reynaud was the Prime Minister of France when the German Wehrmacht launched its invasion of France and the Low Countries on May 10, 1940. His leadership during the early stages of the Battle of France was marked by the rapid collapse of French defenses and the subsequent political crisis.
#1926
Under Section 22-B of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, with whom may the Chairman of NAB conduct a joint investigation?
(a) Both A and B
(b) Any other agency
(c) Any person
(d) A specified agency
Explanation: Section 22-B of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, provides the Chairman of the National Accountability Bureau with the flexibility to conduct investigations in collaboration with other entities. This includes the ability to partner with any other government agency or any individual deemed necessary for the investigation. This provision enhances the bureau's capacity to gather evidence and conduct complex inquiries by leveraging external expertise and resources.
#1927
According to Section 29 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, under what condition may an accused person testify as a competent witness in their own defense?
(a) None of the above
(b) Without oath
(c) Under oath
(d) Both under and without oath
Explanation: Section 29 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, grants the accused the right to appear as a witness in their own defense. To ensure the reliability and legal weight of such testimony, the law requires that the accused must provide their statement under oath. This allows the accused to present their version of events formally to disprove the charges brought against them.
#1928
Under Section 26-A of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, what is the nature of the pardon that the Chairman of NAB may grant to an individual?
(a) Both A and B
(b) Fully
(c) None of above
(d) Conditionally
Explanation: Section 26-A of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, empowers the Chairman of the National Accountability Bureau to grant a pardon to any person involved in an offense. This pardon can be granted either unconditionally (fully) or subject to specific conditions, depending on the circumstances of the case and the cooperation provided by the individual in the investigation or prosecution process.
#1929
Under Section 22B of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, with whom may the Chairman of the NAB conduct an investigation?
(a) Both A and B
(b) Any other agency
(c) A specified agency
(d) Any person
Explanation: Section 22B of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, empowers the Chairman of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to collaborate during investigations. This provision allows the Chairman to conduct investigations in conjunction with other agencies or individuals, facilitating a comprehensive approach to uncovering corruption and financial crimes by leveraging resources and expertise from various sources as deemed necessary for the investigation.
#1930
Upon what grounds may an authorized officer initiate the process of tracing assets under the relevant accountability laws?
(a) Reasonable suspicion
(b) Receipt of complaint
(c) Credible information
(d) All of above
Explanation: Authorized officers under accountability legislation, such as the National Accountability Ordinance, are empowered to trace assets when they have sufficient cause. This includes acting upon credible information, receiving formal complaints, or forming a reasonable suspicion regarding the illicit origin of assets. These broad powers are intended to facilitate the recovery of assets acquired through corrupt practices.
#1931
According to Section 29 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, in what manner may an accused person provide evidence in their defense to refute charges?
(a) On oath
(b) None of above
(c) Without oath
(d) Both of above
Explanation: Section 29 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, explicitly grants the accused the right to be a competent witness for the defense. It specifies that the accused may give evidence on oath in disproof of the charges brought against them. This provision is designed to allow the accused to present their version of events under the solemnity of an oath during the accountability trial process.
#1932
According to Section 18B of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, how may a reference be initiated by the Bureau?
(a) Its own accord
(b) All of above
(c) A reference received from the appropriate government
(d) Receipt of complaint
Explanation: Section 18B of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, provides multiple avenues for the initiation of a reference. The Bureau can act upon receiving a formal reference from the government, upon the receipt of a specific complaint from a citizen or entity, or by taking suo motu cognizance of a matter on its own accord, ensuring comprehensive coverage in the fight against corruption.
#1933
Under Section 26A of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, what type of pardon may the Chairman of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) grant to an individual?
(a) None of above
(b) Fully
(c) Conditionally
(d) Both A and B
Explanation: Section 26A of the National Accountability Ordinance grants the Chairman of NAB the authority to tender a pardon to any person involved in an offense. This pardon can be granted either conditionally or unconditionally (fully), depending on the cooperation provided by the individual during the investigation or trial process.
#1934
Which section of the Civil Procedure Code (C.P.C.) specifies the grounds upon which a second appeal may be filed?
(a) Section 101, C.P.C.
(b) Section 100, C.P.C.
(c) Section 99, C.P.C.
(d) None of these
Explanation: Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides the statutory basis for filing a second appeal to the High Court. A second appeal is generally restricted to cases involving a substantial question of law, rather than questions of fact. This limitation is designed to prevent endless litigation and ensures that the highest courts focus on interpreting legal principles rather than re-evaluating evidence.
#1935
What action may the Court take if an appellant fails to appear when their appeal is called for hearing on the scheduled date?
(a) Both A and B
(b) The Court may make an order that the appeal be adjourned
(c) The Court may make order that the appeal be dismissed
(d) None of these
Explanation: Under the Code of Civil Procedure, if an appellant does not appear when the appeal is called for hearing, the court is empowered to dismiss the appeal for default. While adjournment is possible at the court's discretion, dismissal is the standard procedural consequence for non-appearance.
#1936
If a party is affected by a decree for which an appeal is permissible but chooses not to file one, what legal remedy may they pursue?
(a) None of the these
(b) Apply for revision
(c) Apply for review
(d) Both A and B
Explanation: A review petition is available to a party who is aggrieved by a decree or order from which an appeal is allowed but has not been preferred. This allows the court that passed the decree to reconsider its decision based on the discovery of new evidence or an error apparent on the face of the record.
#1937
If a review petition is dismissed due to the applicant's failure to appear, under what conditions may it be restored?
(a) Upon application of applicant if it justify. His absence in satisfactory manners
(b) None of the above
(c) When ever Court like
(d) None of the these
Explanation: When a review petition is dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the applicant, the court retains the inherent power to restore the petition. The applicant must file a formal application providing a sufficient and satisfactory explanation for their absence. The court evaluates this justification to determine if the interests of justice warrant the restoration of the petition to its original status.
#1938
Under what circumstances may a court initiate a reference to the High Court?
(a) The Court facing question of law himself
(b) The Court through parties of the case
(c) Both A and B
(d) None of the these
Explanation: A reference to the High Court under the Civil Procedure Code can be initiated by the subordinate court on its own motion when it encounters a significant question of law, or it may be requested by the parties involved in the litigation. This mechanism ensures that legal ambiguities are resolved by a higher judicial authority, maintaining consistency in the application of law across lower courts.
#1939
Under what circumstances may a subordinate court make a reference to the High Court?
(a) When the executing Court faces doubt in question of law
(b) None of the these
(c) Both A and B
(d) When executing Court Faces doubt in question of usage
Explanation: A subordinate court is empowered to refer a case to the High Court when it entertains reasonable doubt regarding a question of law or the validity of a usage. This mechanism serves to provide clarity and guidance from the higher judiciary, preventing potential miscarriages of justice that might arise from an incorrect interpretation of legal principles or established customs by lower courts.
#1940
What action may the court take if the appellant fails to appear when the appeal is called for hearing?
(a) The Court may make order that the appeal be dismissed
(b) The Court may make an order that the appeal be adjourned
(c) None of the these
(d) Both A and B
Explanation: Under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, if an appellant does not appear at the scheduled hearing, the court is empowered to dismiss the appeal for default. This rule ensures the efficient administration of justice by preventing unnecessary delays caused by the absence of the party responsible for initiating the appellate process.