Alternate Dispute Resolution _Section 89-A_ MCQs

Prepare for Alternate Dispute Resolution _Section 89-A_ MCQs with verified questions, past-paper solutions, and conceptual explanations for CSS, PMS, FPSC, PPSC, and NTS examinations.

19 Solved Questions • 15 Mins Practice • Updated for 2026 Competitive Exams
MCQS
2026 Solved Edition · Updated October 2026 · Verified Editorial Standards

Welcome to the verified preparation module for Alternate Dispute Resolution _Section 89-A_ MCQs on McqsMind. This comprehensive set offers solved multiple-choice questions with answers, detailed explanations, and authentic past-paper style questions aligned with the latest syllabus of Civil Procedure Code _CPC_ (Law).

100% Verified Answer Keys CSS, PMS, FPSC, PPSC, NTS Ready 2026/2027 Syllabus Guidelines

Direct Definition & Conceptual Scope

AEO Verified

Alternate Dispute Resolution _Section 89-A_ constitutes an essential examination topic within Law, evaluating theoretical principles, historical context, and practical problem-solving applications. On MCQsMind, candidates practice verified past-paper solutions, conceptual breakdowns, and syllabus-aligned questions tailored for CSS, PMS, and competitive screening examinations.

Solved Questions

Practice with answers, explanations, and exam-focused revision notes.

19 MCQs Page 1

High-Yield Exam Revision Cheat Sheet & Mnemonics

Essential exam standard definitions and formulas for rapid 2-minute revision

High-Frequency Articles
  • Art. 6: High Treason
  • Art. 9: Security of Person
  • Art. 19-A: Right to Information
  • Art. 25-A: Free Education (5–16 yrs)
Federalism & Provinces
  • Art. 140-A: Local Government
  • Art. 153: Council of Common Interests
  • Art. 160: National Finance Commission
  • Art. 175-A: Judicial Commission (JCP)
Islamic Provisions
  • Art. 2: Islam as State Religion
  • Art. 2A: Objectives Resolution Substantive
  • Art. 203: Federal Shariat Court (FSC)
  • Art. 228: Council of Islamic Ideology

Topic Notes: Alternate Dispute Resolution _Section 89-A_

Quick Revision 2 min read 13 key points
Section 1 of 4

1 1. Background and Meaning of Section 89-A

4 points
  • Definition Jan 2002
    Section 89-A: Introduced via the CPC (Amendment) Ordinance 2002, this provision empowers civil courts to encourage settlement of disputes through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) methods to reduce litigation backlog.
  • Theory
    Primary Objective: The legislative intent is to provide an expeditious, cost-effective, and amicable resolution mechanism, shifting the focus from adversarial litigation to consensus-based outcomes.
  • Fact
    Scope of Referral: The court may refer a case to ADR at any stage of the proceedings, provided the court deems it appropriate for settlement.
  • Fact
    Consent Requirement: Referral to ADR under Section 89-A generally requires the consent of the parties involved, ensuring that the process remains voluntary and party-driven.
Section 1 / 4
Swipe or tap Prev / Next to revise all sections.

Want adaptive tracking for this topic?

Login to save wrong answers to your Mistake Bank and build your weakness heatmap automatically.

Session Progress 0 / 0 Solved
Reveal answers to start tracking your session progress!
1
Who determines the terms of the settlement in an ADR process under Section 89-A?
Moderate · 64% Accuracy
Share
2
What is the effect of a settlement under Section 89-A on the court fee paid by the parties?
Moderate · 64% Accuracy
Share
3
Under Section 89-A, can the Court refer a case to ADR if it believes the parties are acting in bad faith?
Moderate · 64% Accuracy
Share
4
Which principle governs the confidentiality of the ADR process under Section 89-A?
Moderate · 64% Accuracy
Share
5
What is the primary role of the Court after a settlement is reached via ADR under Section 89-A?
Moderate · 64% Accuracy
Share
6
Section 89-A was incorporated into the CPC 1908 through which legislative amendment?
Moderate · 64% Accuracy
Share
7
Which of the following is excluded from the scope of ADR under Section 89-A?
Moderate · 64% Accuracy
Share
8
What happens if the parties fail to reach a settlement through the ADR process initiated under Section 89-A?
Moderate · 64% Accuracy
Share
9
Who is responsible for appointing the mediator or conciliator under the ADR framework of Section 89-A?
Moderate · 64% Accuracy
Share
10
If a settlement is reached through ADR under Section 89-A, what is the legal status of that settlement?
Moderate · 64% Accuracy
Share
Pedagogical Syllabus Blueprint

Alternate Dispute Resolution _Section 89-A_ MCQs: Preparation Strategy & Exam Blueprint

Examination Weightage & Commission Distribution

In Pakistan's premier competitive examinations—including the Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC General Recruitment & CSS MPT), Punjab Public Service Commission (PPSC Lecturer, Tehsildar & PMS Screening), KPPSC, SPSC, and BPSC—questions derived from Alternate Dispute Resolution _Section 89-A_ MCQs consistently constitute a decisive 10% to 25% weightage of the Civil Procedure Code _CPC_ paper. Testing agencies frequently evaluate both foundational factual recall and deeper analytical comprehension, requiring aspirants to master key dates, statutory articles, constitutional clauses, and thematic definitions.

High-Yield Conceptual Pillars & Distractor Analysis

Historical trend analysis across past five-year examination cycles demonstrates that examiner traps frequently involve closely matched numerical alternatives, chronologically contiguous treaties, and semantic subtleties in statutory phraseology. When preparing Alternate Dispute Resolution _Section 89-A_ MCQs, candidates must deliberately review the underlying rationale provided for every question rather than merely memorizing raw answer options. Understanding why incorrect distractors fail is the most reliable predictor of achieving top percentiles in computerized and optical mark recognition (OMR) screening tests.

Negative Marking Mitigation & Time Management Protocol

For examinations enforcing negative marking penalties (such as PPSC's 0.25-mark deduction per erroneous response or NTS gatekeeper quotas), an aggressive elimination technique must be deployed. Candidates should systematically rule out improbable options first to elevate probability thresholds from 25% to 50% or 100%. Allocating an average of 45 to 60 seconds per item during mock trials builds the psychological stamina and cognitive precision required to complete 100-question papers within official 90-minute time limits.

Recommended Reference Sources & Statutory Reading

To achieve definitive conceptual mastery in Law, candidates are advised to cross-reference our solved explanations with primary gazettes, statutory texts, and canonical academic textbooks. Verifying controversial questions against authentic official repositories guarantees that prospective civil servants and professional candidates present incontestable answers during both optical paper evaluations and viva voce departmental interviews.